Accidents et Incidents aériens
| Auteur | Message | |
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 17 mai 2008 15:43 | |
|
Tout faux chez Air India et ... ils se sont mis à 4 ingénieurs pour réussir ce coup !! Accident: Air India B772 at Mumbai on May 16th 2008, nose gear collapsed at gate By Simon Hradecky, created Friday, May 16th 2008 12:10Z, last updated Saturday, May 17th 2008 12:52Z An Air India Boeing 777-200ER, registration VT-AIK supposed to perform flight AI717 from Mumbai (India) to Dubai (United Arab Emirates), suffered the collapse of its nose gear while parked at the gate just before boarding. No injuries were reported. The passengers were brought to Dubai with a replacement aircraft. At the time of the gear collapse four engineers were performing an inspection, one in the cockpit and three on the ground. The gear handle was put into the gear up position, however it was forgotten to insert the gear pin in the nose gear strut, that would have prevented actual retraction of the gear. http://www.theaviationherald.com/h?arti ... p;opt=2048 _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 17 mai 2008 16:33 | |
|
Le crash d'heathrow Le mystère demeure !! Comments de J Wallace, Seattle PI ... rien de nouveau ! British authorities have not said much publicly about the accident. They released a report yesterday saying they suspected that the plane's fuel flow became restricted somewhere between the engines and the fuel tanks. They did not indicate what they thought caused the blockage. Ice collecting in or near an engine component has emerged as the prime suspect, according to sources familiar with the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the probe. It is ironic, outside experts said, that investigators have not figured out what caused the jet to crash about 1,000 feet short of a runway at Heathrow Airport. Investigators expected a quick resolution because they have obtained more data and information about the accident than any they can recall in aviation history, according to sources and outside experts. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/ JPRS Paris _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
eolien
Inscrit le 30/01/2008 |
# 17 mai 2008 17:30 | |
|
Je pioche une répnse adaptée à ce dérapage dans les "amabilités" que votre maître à penser vous distille généreusement : Message 29/04/2008 à 08h34 Topic "Choix de moteurs..." |
||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 17 mai 2008 20:14 | |
|
Bonsoir ! La FAA et AA argumentent sévérement !! En pleine polémique ... pour la bagatelle de 3300 vols annulés !! En plus ça discute ferme sur les coups de foudre (Les vrais) http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/648668.html FAA and American Airlines blame each other for cancellations By TREBOR BANSTETTER Star-Telegram staff writer American canceled about 3,300 flights April 7-12, stranding hundreds of thousands of passengers. STAR-TELEGRAM/TOM PENNINGTON American canceled about 3,300 flights April 7-12, stranding hundreds of thousands of passengers. * FAA and American Airlines blame each other for cancellations Last month's grounding of American Airlines MD-80 jets, which caused more than 3,000 flight cancellations, could have been avoided if the Federal Aviation Administration had accepted a plan to keep the planes in service while conducting inspections, the airline told the secretary of transportation. Instead, the FAA forced American to ground the planes, even though safety was never compromised, the airline said. "At no time has there been any safety of flight issue with regard to American's MD-80 fleet as a result of its compliance with this" safety directive, wrote Robert Reding, American's executive vice president of operations, in a letter to Transportation Secretary Mary Peters. "In our view, the root cause of the fleet grounding was a communications failure within the FAA and between the FAA and American," he wrote. On Friday, the Transportation Department released Reding's letter and a report from the FAA on the cancellations. The FAA said American had plenty of time to inspect the planes and make any necessary repairs. The agency also said there were serious safety concerns with the airplanes. "American Airlines did not perform adequate or sufficient work in response to [safety rules] on its MD-80 fleet," the agency said. "The workmanship accomplished in response to this [safety directive] was unacceptable." JPRS Paris (Message édité par Beochien le 17/05/2008 21h24) _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 17 mai 2008 20:21 | |
|
(Message édité par Beochien le 17/05/2008 21h22) _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
eolien
Inscrit le 30/01/2008 |
# 17 mai 2008 21:53 | |
|
Les tordus peuvent rester ... sais pas où ... |
||
|
|
||
|
vonrichthoffen
Inscrit le 07/08/2006 |
# 18 mai 2008 00:24 | |
|
Allez, pour détendre l'atmosphère, un petit clin d'oeil aux pilotes d' American Airline (pas de possibilité de videoconférence sur AeroWeb, on ne peut donc pas faire de concours de pets flambés). http://youtube.com/watch?v=DHmrcCfdZFM |
||
|
|
||
|
sevrien
Inscrit le 08/08/2006 |
# 18 mai 2008 00:43 | |
|
La polémique ne m'intéresse pas, de plus !! |
||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 18 mai 2008 15:13 | |
|
Bonjour Je ne sais pas ou la mettre celle là Côté Chinook ... Chez Boeing ... Scaring ! c'est tout !!! Et rien d'anti Boeing, cela ne devrait pas exister, c'est tout ! Collateral damage feared at Boeing Culture takes hit in copter attacks By Maria Panaritis and Stacey Burling Inquirer Staff Writers It was a crime so disturbing that the aircraft electrician who discovered it on a combat helicopter-assembly line at the Boeing Co. plant in Ridley Township last week almost threw up. A bundle of about 75 electrical wires controlling the instruments on a Boeing Chinook CH-47F - "the life and breath of the aircraft," in one union leader's words - had been slashed. Half the wires in the three-inch-thick cluster had been severed. Someone, it seemed, had hacked away at a $30 million aircraft that has been a workhorse for the military since the Vietnam War and a lifeline to the local labor force that produces it for the world's armed forces. "I almost vomited," the assembly-line electrician later told Boeing union executive Joe Phillips, who recounted the conversation. "When I saw that, it made me sick to my stomach," the inspecting electrician told Phillips. The attack on this and one other Chinook, which authorities are investigating as a federal crime, has not only shined a light of suspicion on Boeing's employees and security practices. It also has impugned the patriotic pride and integrity and threatened the economic security of members of a workforce acutely aware that they are the last of a dying breed. "For somebody to do this, it was like they took a personal stab at all of us," said Ed Panco, a Ridley Township commissioner who works as a quality inspector at Boeing. "You're attacking our livelihoods," said Panco, who was not among the group that discovered the problem on the Chinook line that shut down production for several days. "We all depend on Boeing to survive." A team of 10 Defense Department criminal investigators is working with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Philadelphia to find the person or people who severed the wires in the one helicopter and placed a critical rotor-blade component where it did not belong in another nearly completed Chinook. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20080 ... eing_.html Et j'ajoute que celui qui a fait cela, j'espère que, s'ils l'attrapent il ne dormira pas chez lui pour un bon bout de temps !! JPRS Paris (Message édité par Beochien le 18/05/2008 15h18) _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
okhly
Inscrit le 11/05/2008 |
# 18 mai 2008 18:16 | |
|
Le mystère demeure !! Comments de J Wallace, Seattle PI ... rien de nouveau ! British authorities have not said much publicly about the accident. They released a report yesterday saying they suspected that the plane's fuel flow became restricted somewhere between the engines and the fuel tanks. They did not indicate what they thought caused the blockage. Ice collecting in or near an engine component has emerged as the prime suspect, according to sources familiar with the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the probe. It is ironic, outside experts said, that investigators have not figured out what caused the jet to crash about 1,000 feet short of a runway at Heathrow Airport. Investigators expected a quick resolution because they have obtained more data and information about the accident than any they can recall in aviation history, according to sources and outside experts. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/ JPRS Paris _________________ |
||
|
|
||
|
okhly
Inscrit le 11/05/2008 |
# 18 mai 2008 19:17 | |
|
C'est très surprenant , voire un peu inquiètant , que la cause du crash du Boeing 777-200 à Heathrow le 17 janvier 2008 ne soit pas élucidée. _________________ |
||
|
|
||
|
pesawat
Inscrit le 06/01/2007 |
# 18 mai 2008 20:17 | |
| Des hypocrites c'est tout, ce qui s'est passé c'est une panne sèche, simplement , comme une compagnie américaine vous savez... juste ce qu'il faut pour faire le vol sans penser aux éventuels changements de direction de vents, portants c'est sur que cela consomme moins mais si cela change ou un autre paramètre qui change et hop panne en phase descente a quelques kms de l'atterissage.Les pilotes vont parler peut etre! | ||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 18 mai 2008 20:31 | |
|
Bonsoir Hypothése moins que crédible Pesawatt, au Congo possible chez les GB et leur commissions d'enquête ... non ! à 99.9 % ! Désolé ! 10 000 litres dans les réservoirs dixit toutes les sources .... PB combustible .. en examen et possible !!! JPRS Paris _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
|
eolien
Inscrit le 30/01/2008 |
# 18 mai 2008 21:02 | |
|
Bonsoir Pesawat, Il me semble me souvenir que les réservoirs d'ailes ont été crevé par les trains principaux et qu'il y avait du kérozène dans l'herbe. Ca n'a pas pris feu ! Au delà du mystère de ce crash, il faudra retenir le coup de bol immense de son déroulement. Bonne soirée, Eolien777 |
||
|
|
||
|
Beochien
Inscrit le 13/02/2007 |
# 18 mai 2008 21:12 | |
|
Bonsoir Pour Eolien, Juste mon avis perso ! De mémoire, le fuel répandu venait du rémanent de pompes et canalisations (Donc assez peu) vu l'ordre des coupures de circuits dans la procédure de crash ...débats précédents ... je ne cherches plus à cette heure ! C'est vite fait de mémoire !! Si ça peut aider ... Suis pas sur du tout qu'ils aient répandu un réservoir ?? De toute façon il en restait (Du fuel) à prélever pour les enquêteurs, l'avion n'a pas brûlé !! JPRS Paris _________________ JPRS |
||
|
|
||
Ajouter une réponse
Vous devez être inscrit et connecté sur AeroWeb pour pouvoir ajouter une réponse à ce sujet !
